Professional physicists dislike considering the use of potentials for
the creation of work in the load.
This is explainable in view of their staunch footings in the Law of
Conservation of Energy.
Yet it is possible to demonstrate there is in fact no rule in Nature
against free energetics. The simple
availability of potential fields is a sufficient condition for the
driving of fuel-less power systems.
Once such a system is operational, certain effects emerge which are
connected to the Law of Conservation of Energy and which suggest the formulation
of this Law in a more general view.
The solution of the reactionless support-free motion problem is provided by means of asymmetrical potential interaction is also proposed.
There is an "indisputable" formulations that is universally applied
by physicists: the total work of the
Potential field along a closed trajectory is equal to zero. Indeed,
from Fig.1 we can see that part
of the work is positive (acceleration) and the other part ot the work
is negative (deceleration).
Fig. 1, Fig.2.1, Fig.2.2.
In Physics textbooks, the task of applying the Potential for making
only positive work in both
parts is absent. This may be explained by the unwillingness of textbooks
writers to discuss the
more interesting question of energy transformations when the inner
structure of space-time is
changed. Figure2 shows the same charged mass M rotation in an potential
electric field. The difference is in the mode of interaction. The polarity
of it is changed when positive work is changed to negative. Figure 2.1
shows that the direction of field is changed. Figure 22. shows that the
sign of the charge is changed.
There is a another set of simple examples of application of potential
field for the creation of only
positive work in the load. Figure 3 is an arrangement similar of a
water mill wheel.
Fig.3, Fig.4, Fig.5, Fig.6
Now let's compare this to Figure 1. Can you see the miller who submerged
the entire wheel in the river water flow and thereby 'scientifically' proved
that it is impossible to use water flow for the creation of power ? But
our professors use a similar argument to show that the total work of the
potential in a closed cycle is always zero !
Actually, the part of the trajectory, or periodic cycle which constitutes negative work (deceleration) portion may be excluded by means of spatial superimposition, pulsed mode, change of interaction polarity, or by means of a screen (Fig. 4.)
Fig. 5 shows that changes in the arrangement of electrodes ot vacuum tubes allow one to increased the energy of emission current electrons.
These basic schemes concepts require further development for industrial
application, of course.
Note that Coulomb's interaction is inversely proportional to the square
of the distance, so it is
necessary to try to decrease this distance to obtain greater interaction.
Figure 6 shows a "free energy"
device similar to a well-known electric machine. Let us consider the
interaction of 2 segments that
have opposite charges. In the case of a constant sign of interaction,
the process corresponds to the
above "totally submerged" water wheel conclusion of the miller. Figure
6. 1 shows that the attraction
between segments creates a propulsion force and that the rotor is moving
with some acceleration.
Figure 6.2 notes the point of balance, and then Figure 6.3 shows that
the rotor is decelerated
since segments remain in attraction. The total work of the potential
field is equal to zero. But why?
It is not an indispensable condition of Nature. It enough to change
the sign of interaction between
segments, after the balance point, from attraction to repulsion to
create the mode of acceleration
again! And this can be done by judiciously switching (reversing)
the potential itself at the appropriate time. In this case both halves
of the cycle are in acceleration. We omit the technological and descriptions
of the group of contacts, collector brushes, condensers, transformers,
and so on.
It is not news that potential fields can perform work Any textbook show
examples of closed
circuit negative-positive cycling of such work and proves that
the total work of successive acceleration and deceleration is equal to
zero. But since this closed circuit process is actually the successive
performance of two work processes, it is possible to change the parameters
of one process and change the cycle into the sum of two or several sequential
parts, each of positive work The trick is in the point-momentum of balance.
Let us consider the use of potential field for the creation of propulsion
force and reactionless, support-free motion. Figure 7 shows an ordinary
flat electric condenser.
Two flat plates are in attraction (different charges) or in repulsion (like charges). The total resultant force of the two-plate system equals to zero and the material system of the charged condenser remains immobile. To discover a solution for a non-zero unilateral resultant force, all we need is to note that the force line of the potential field is always perpendicular to the charged surface and take advantage of that fact.
Figure 8 shows the same condenser but one plate is perpendicular with
regards to the other plate.
The vertical plate is divided into several elements in order to decrease
distance of Coulomb's interaction between plates. The total force resultant
between any two vertical elements is the sum of
opposing forces and it equals to zero. But the total force that applies
between a vertical plate and the
horizontal plate is a sum of co-directional elementary forces and it
is not equal to zero. The system
thus moves by means of its asymmetrical potential interaction.
Note that the perpendicular elements may have cylindrical shape. The
propulsion force may be
regulated by means of change of angle between plates of the asymmetrical
condenser or by of a
changing the potential.
The well-known experiments with "inertioidal" moving systems may be
considered as a particular
case of asymmetrical (vector) potential technology. When eccentric
mass is moving along epicycloidal or cardioidal trajectory, it creates
a propulsion force that is the result of the gradient of
acceleration . This process is described by a vector potential conception.
Since asymmetrical scalar potential interaction does not require additional
power after is generation, the scalar technology is
more interesting for the aerospace industry than inertial propulsion
systems.
(With T.E.Bearden's commentary)
We pose a common sense question: Where do we take the power from, for making work in the load, if we use potential energy for it and the potential is not exhausted? Note that the existence of force effects of potential fields must raise the same question.
Why magnets don't exhaust?
Why can a simple permanent magnet (with its vector potential) hold and
suspend a massive
piece of metal when in so doing it continually makes work against force
af gravity and yet it does
not require any fuel and power And the magnet does not weaken and is
not exhausted?
E. T. Whittaker's conception of potential as a bi-directional flow of
energy is developed by T.E.
Bearden in Gravitobiology. The generalization of Newton's Third Law
in this conception leads to a
requirement of complementary pairs of conjugate photons for the electromagnetic
radiation process.
Since the process means the change of information (i.e., of the structure
of space) in time, the
pair's anti-process takes place in reverse-time. Certainly, the anti-process
is developed from its
own past time in the future, but from our point of view it is changes
from the future in past time. In
this generalized Newton's Third Law the inner structure of the electric
potential field is created by
two oncoming flows of energy: the photons are spreading from the charge-source
of the potential
field and the antiphotons are inflowing into that point-centre of charged
mass.
Now let's return to a question that rings true: Since "something" cannot
spring up from "nothing", what is "reduced' or depleted, and where, if
in the local area of our space-time the free energy process takes place
and some power is dispersed in the load?
T. D. Lee's "vacuum engineering"
Let's generalize this question. 'Space-time" and "potential" and "energy"
are identically the same
thing. In this conception, the well-known ability of energy to change
its form is extended to allow
energy to "change" into a space-time change, and vice-versa. This notion
is already inherent in general relativity. In this manner we invert the
usual notion that energy moves through an inert, featureless space-time
(vacuum) to interact upon a mass and alter its energy, position, mass,
charge.
or all four. Instead, we now have extended and applied John Archlbald
Wheeler's admonition
that "Space acts on matter, telling it how to move" [1]. Bearden
calls such action upon a mass by the local space-time and its dynamic structure
a vacuum engine, after the "vacuum engineering" suggested by Nobelian T.
D. Lee. [2]
Thus from "energy" as "ordering and disordering" of the hidden spatial
structure, we arrive at energy
as a descriptive of any process. The note of "process" as the change
of information or spatial structure in time from the point of view of the
observer explains the effects that are connected with
changes of natural potential field energetics balance.
So the potential field can be considered as a bi-directional process/anti-process.
Usually energyinformation that is radiated by the source of the potential
field (the direct process in time) has some difference with the energyinformation
that is received (the anti-process in reverse-time). This difference causes
the rate of time for this mass object and causes the existence of this
mass as the
source of the potential field. This difference is equal to trapped
energy of mass-form that can be
transformed into radiation energy, as the cause of mass decay. If the
potential field is used only for
making positive work of acceleration, then according to the Conservation
Law the power process in
space-time must be balanced by a corresponding power anti-process in
the space of reverse-time.
This imbalance of bi-directional flow of potential energy shows itself
as a local change of spatial
curvature and a change in the local rate of flow of time.
The concept of the highly energetic Vacuum is fully accepted in physics. It has been thermodynamically shown that in principle the electrical energy of the vacuum can be extracted as heat and power [3]. It only remains to make the local vacuum potential partially asymmetrical, then gate and freely utilize the energy available from that asymmetry.
If it is necessary for technology, it is possible to make calculations
of the amount of power that
must be dispersed as heat to obtain the mode of total compensation
of natural spatial planet curvature and rate of time in the local area
of space-time.
So it is impossible to create "something" from "nothing". But the creation
of an external "free energy" flow process is balanced by a corresponding
internal anti-process and you do not create
"something from nothing" from the point of view of Eternity. Consequently
such a process does not
violate the laws of physics.
Further, mass itself consists of trapped energy, so it may be considered
to be a very strong, localized
scalar potential [4]. This potential also must consist of bi-directional
wave pairs, and thus be subject to direct electromagnetic engineering by
means of external alteration of its constituent Whittaker waves.
So after Whittaker's representation of conventional electromagnetics
as a function of two scalar
potentials and his decomposition of any potential into bi-directional
wave pairs, it becomes possible
experimentally verify the old philosophical idea of the unreality of
material existence. The departure from the static notion of mass to a dynamic
description of the material world's existence allows the development ot
the conception of the electromagnetic design template of local physical
reality. Since the mass (and matter) is a process that is balanced by a
reverse-process, there are no difficulties in principle to develop such
technologies as transmutation of chemical elements [6], materialization
and dematerialization, teleportation and so on.
The application of potential energy for the creation of power does not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy that remains true in the more general global view:
The complete energy of a four-dimensional system is the sum of its energy of space-time processes and its energy of space-reverse-time processes, and it is constant and equal to zero.
References
1. W. Misner, K.S. Thorne and J.A.Wheeler, Gravitation, W.H. Freeman
and Co., San Francisco, 1973, p.5.
2. Lee, T.D. Particle physics and introduction to fled theory.
Harwood. New York, 1981. Ch. 25: Outlook: Possibility of vacuum engineering:
p. 824-828.
3. Cole, Daniel C. and Harold E. Puthoff, Extracting energy and
heat from the vacuum, Physical Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, Aug. 1993, p.1562-1585.
4. T.E. Bearden, A redefinition of the Energy Ansatz, leading to a
fundamentally new class of nuclear reactions. Proceedings of the 27th Intersociety
Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC 92). Town & Country
Hotel Convention Centre, San Diego, California, 1992, p. 4.303-4.310.
T.E.Bearden